Unraveling brain evolution

​Dr. Maurizio De Pittà in front of a chalk board with formulas written on it.
​Dr. Maurizio De Pittà, a senior author of the study, is a scientist at UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute, assistant professor in Temerty Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto and affiliate scientist at the Basque Center of Applied Mathematics. (Photo: UHN Research)

In a landmark study published in Science, Dr. Maurizio De Pittà, a scientist at UHN’s Krembil Brain Institute, Dr. Fernando García-Moreno of the Achucarro Basque Center for Neuroscience, and their colleagues explored the long-debated evolutionary origins of the neocortex — the part of the brain responsible for complex functions such as cognition and sensory perception.

Until now, researchers were uncertain whether the process forming the neocortex and similar brain structures in amniotes — organisms, such as humans, which develop in amniotic fluid — was conserved, meaning it was passed down through evolution from a common ancestor.

Using an innovative approach combining brain cell (also called neurogenic), gene expression (also called transcriptional), and mathematical analyses, the team looked for commonalities in genes and the timing and location of the growth and development of the neurons in the circuits that make up structures such as the neocortex (called pallial circuits).

If the developmental process was conserved, these features would be the same, or homologous, across the models of different amniotes.

However, rather than similarities, the team found significant divergence instead.

Analysis revealed that genes expressed by the neurons destined to be part of pallial circuits differed greatly very early on in development. Researchers also found that the timing and location of neuron development varied markedly between models.

These findings challenge the theory that structures such as the neocortex are conserved and instead support an alternate hypothesis: that they evolved convergently.

Using advanced mathematical models developed by Dr. De Pittà with the Krembil Computational Neuroscience Hub to further analyze their findings, the research team identified that while the developmental origins of pallial circuits in different amniotes vary, all these circuits perform very similar (or analogous) functions.

Equipped with this interpretation, the researchers propose that because of the vital role of structures such as the neocortex, coupled with environmental pressures (for example, available nutrition), evolution drove different developmental processes to produce the same type of circuits.

Drs. De Pittà and García-Moreno and their colleagues’ work is an important step towards understanding our evolutionary history. It not only deepens our understanding of the driving forces behind neurodevelopment but may also inspire other researchers to seek evidence to explain why and how other brain structures, or other bodily systems, evolved.

Understanding how and why these systems came to be is crucial for advancing their care in the future.

This study was supported by generous donors to UHN Foundation.

An AI generated image of the human brain
Despite their differences, many organisms face the same evolutionary pressures. The similarities in brain structures that function equivalently across organisms, despite different developmental processes, suggest this organization exists because it optimizes for those pressures. (Photo: Getty Images)

This site uses cookies to provide you with a great user experience. By continuing on our site, you accept use of cookies. For more information, please visit our privacy policy.

CLOSE

Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Instagram YouTube